top of page

ASCO Position on Copay Benefit Design Exposes Drug Manufacturer Influence On National Policy

Updated: Aug 14, 2023


2021-AccumulatorsPolicyBrief
.pdf
Download PDF • 229KB

This article is a quickly thrown together position statement vilifying a type of plan sponsor prescription benefit design that utilizes pharmaceutical manufacturer marketing programs to lower employer pharmacy benefit costs.


ASCO calls out several prescription utilization management designs dubbed, "Maximizers" and "Accumulators", as being harmful to patients and time consuming for physician practices to navigate.


Putting aside the poor and partially accurate description of the benefit designs they attack ASCO fails to highlight the blatant conflict of interest when a physician organization attacks a employer (payer) benefit design that, if banned, will only put money back in the pockets of the pharmaceutical manufacturer.


This position statement calls for legislation to prohibit these maximizer and accumulator benefit designs but does not call for changes to prohibit manufacturer copay assistance programs as well. They are calling for the federal government to step in and ban this type of design, the very organization that has banned copay assistance programs from their own health benefit plans (Medicare and Medicaid). It's well documented these programs are manufacturer marketing tools with clear ROI for the manufacturer but does ASCO point out the benefits to their constituents as well? Why is that?


When a manufacturer funds a patient's prescription drug copayment and those funds accumulate toward a patient's deductible and out-of-pocket maximum the manufacturer is, in essence, subsidizing all remaining medical costs for that patient. This includes all physician office visits, medical procedures, copayments for other medications (not funded by the brand program), infusion therapy visits and the list goes on. The amount of manufacturer copay assistance is a small fraction of the total medication cost paid by the plan sponsor or employer. Of course the author advocates for this when they are relieved of the burden of collecting copayments or dealing with bad debt because their patient is having their medical care subsidized by a manufacturer.


Yes, it is extremely unfortunate that a patient on medication funded by patient assistance programs is required to take that medication to sustain or improve their health but does that make it acceptable? How about the coworker with a serious illness that isn't eligible for such a subsidy? They pay the full amount required by their benefit while others within their benefit plan (utilizing drug copay coupons) pay essentially nothing beyond their monthly premium. The employer or plan sponsor ends up paying the rest after the manufacturer support money runs out.


To be transparent, this position statement should have included the following list of donors with affiliations to the pharmaceutical industry. This does not include foundations and other organizations that support ASCO but are indirectly funded by the Industry.


ASCO has passed on an opportunity to address the real issue of affordability within the healthcare supply chain and went right for the topic that transfers money from the employer directly to their donors.

 

List of Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Donors to ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology)

AbbVie Oncology

AbbVie, Inc.

Aduro Biotech, Inc.

Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Amgen

Arcus Biosciences

Array BioPharma Inc.

Astellas

AstraZeneca

Atara Biotherapeutics

Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation

Celgene Corporation

Chesapeake Biotech Partners, LLC

Clovis Oncology

Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Eagle Pharmaceuticals

Eisai Inc.

EMD Serono Inc.

Exelixis, Inc.

Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Genentech BioOncologyâ„¢

Genmab US, Inc.

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

GlaxoSmithKline Foundation

GRAIL, Inc. GlaxoSmithKline Oncology

HalioDx - Luminy Biotech Enterprises

Halozyme Therapeutics

Incyte Corporation Matching Gifts Program

Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Janssen Oncology

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Johnson & Johnson Matching Gifts Program

Lilly

Loxo Oncology Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company

Merck & Co., Inc.

Merck Foundation

Merck KGaA Darmstadt, Germany

Estate of Mike Miller

Mirati Therapeutics, Inc

Mylan

Novartis Corporation

Novartis Oncology

Novocure

Nuventra

Organon

Pfizer Oncology

Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc

PharmaMar

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Roche

Sandoz Inc. (a Novartis Company)

Sanofi Genzyme

Seagen Inc.

Seattle Genetics

Spectrum Pharmaceuticals

Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

TAIHO Oncology, Inc.

TESARO, a GSK Company

YourCause, LLC Trustee for AbbVie Employee Engagement Fund

YourCause, LLC Trustee for Pfizer Annual Giving Campaign

YourCause, LLC Trustee for Pfizer Foundation Matching Gifts

Zai Lab


bottom of page